{"id":1076,"date":"2008-08-02T05:00:53","date_gmt":"2008-08-02T09:00:53","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/morningseditionists.com\/msblog\/?p=1076"},"modified":"2008-08-02T08:25:04","modified_gmt":"2008-08-02T12:25:04","slug":"saturday-open-thread-115","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.morningseditionists.com\/msblog2\/2008\/08\/02\/saturday-open-thread-115\/","title":{"rendered":"Saturday Open Thread"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Ah, thanks to Melina and Vernon for giving me three days in a row off from trying to think of something interesting to say.  You might think that would mean I&#8217;d be able to jump in with something witty and charming today.  You would, of course, be wrong.<\/p>\n<p>Among all the other things that went on this week, you may or may not have noticed the launch of <a href=\"http:\/\/www.cuil.com\">Cuil<\/a> (pronounced &#8220;cool&#8221;).  It&#8217;s an attempt by a bunch of ex-Google engineers to &#8220;out-Google&#8221; Google.  They had a pretty successful pre-launch marketing campaign, I guess.  So successful that the site crashed and burned when reviewers and other curious folks went to the site to see how it matched up to the other search sites out there.<\/p>\n<p>I have my own methods for testing search sites, so I set out to evaluate Cuil.  Up first, the weaselface wallace test.  <a href=\"http:\/\/www.google.com\/search?hl=en&#038;safe=off&#038;rlz=1B3GGGL_enUS176US249&#038;q=weaselface+wallace&#038;btnG=Search\">Search for that at Google<\/a>, and you get, well, this site first, and then links to other sites where people apparently posted Booblehead threads to other blogs and whatnot (rather flattering, actually).  <a href=\"http:\/\/www.cuil.com\/search?q=weaselface+wallace\">Search at Cuil<\/a>, and you get, well, it <strong><em>says<\/em><\/strong> 32 hits, but it only provides one, which appaears to be a rip-off of the 6\/18\/07 booblehead thread, but when you click the link, it&#8217;s to a domain that&#8217;s not longer active. Not terribly impressive.<\/p>\n<p>Next, I tried a search for &#8216;cokie &#8220;the hag&#8221; roberts&#8217; on both sites.  <a href=\"http:\/\/www.google.com\/search?hl=en&#038;safe=off&#038;rlz=1B3GGGL_enUS176US249&#038;q=cokie+%22the+hag%22+roberts&#038;btnG=Search\">Google returned about 350 hits<\/a> (we came in numbers 2 and 3).  <a href=\"http:\/\/www.cuil.com\/search?q=cokie%20%22the%20hag%22%20roberts&#038;sl=long\">Cuil<\/a>?  <\/p>\n<blockquote><p><em>No results were found for: cokie &#8220;the hag&#8221; roberts<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>OK. So maybe Cuil doesn&#8217;t do subtle.  I figured I&#8217;d try something obvious: morning seditionists.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.google.com\/search?hl=en&#038;safe=off&#038;rlz=1B3GGGL_enUS176US249&#038;q=morning+seditionists&#038;btnG=Search\">Google returned 9,270 results<\/a>, with us (as you&#8217;d expect) at the top of the list.  <a href=\"http:\/\/www.cuil.com\/search?q=Morning%20Seditionists&#038;sl=long\">Cuil found 2,125 results<\/a>, with lots of sites linking to ours, but, alas, didn&#8217;t actually return the site itself.<\/p>\n<p>So, while I certainly think that competition is a good thing, I am quite sad to report that Cuil is not all that cool.  In fact &#8220;cuil&#8221; returned over 2.5 million results at Google and less than 125,00 results from Cuil, while &#8220;google&#8221; gets 517 million results returned at Cuil, and over 2.7 billion (with a &#8220;b&#8221;) at Google.  <\/p>\n<p>For now, Cuil fails to get our seal of approval, and Google remains the Morning Seditionists&#8217; official unofficial search engine.<\/p>\n<p>Enjoy your Saturday.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Ah, thanks to Melina and Vernon for giving me three days in a row off from trying to think of something interesting to say. You might think that would mean I&#8217;d be able to jump in with something witty and charming today. You would, of course, be wrong. Among all the other things that went [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1076","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.morningseditionists.com\/msblog2\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1076","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.morningseditionists.com\/msblog2\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.morningseditionists.com\/msblog2\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.morningseditionists.com\/msblog2\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.morningseditionists.com\/msblog2\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1076"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.morningseditionists.com\/msblog2\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1076\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.morningseditionists.com\/msblog2\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1076"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.morningseditionists.com\/msblog2\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1076"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.morningseditionists.com\/msblog2\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1076"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}