{"id":1920,"date":"2009-11-10T06:59:03","date_gmt":"2009-11-10T11:59:03","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/morningseditionists.com\/msblog\/?p=1920"},"modified":"2009-11-10T06:59:03","modified_gmt":"2009-11-10T11:59:03","slug":"tuesday-6","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.morningseditionists.com\/msblog2\/2009\/11\/10\/tuesday-6\/","title":{"rendered":"Tuesday"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I got an e-mail yesterday from somebody or other (Democrats.com or MoveOn or something; can&#8217;t find it right now), that said the House had voted for the &#8220;public option,&#8221; and now it was time to put pressure on the Senate.  I wish you could actually reply to these e-mails, &#8216;cuz I&#8217;d like to ask them, what option?  As far as I know, there&#8217;s no &#8220;option&#8221; involved in what the House passed.  An public option would be, like, you have the option of choosing between your employer&#8217;s plan or the public plan.  Not, you must take your employer&#8217;s plan or get fined.  That&#8217;s the real option there &#8211; get fined or don&#8217;t get fined, depending on what you can afford best.<\/p>\n<p>There also seems to be no real regulation on the insurance companies, either.  First off, they get until 2013 to jack up rates as high as they can (which they&#8217;ve already promised to do).  After that, they&#8217;re not allowed to deny people based on existing conditions (supposedly; who wants to bet they won&#8217;t find some loophole in nearly 2,000+ pages of needlessly complicated legislation), and supposedly caps out of pocket expenses, but I don&#8217;t see where it limits how much insurance companies can charge for premiums.  And the idiot Republicans have the audacity to call this a &#8220;government takeover&#8221; of health care.  <\/p>\n<p>Which just goes to show that they should have just insisted on Medicare for everybody.  Then <strong><em>maybe<\/em><\/strong> we could have gotten something worthwhile (that didn&#8217;t attempt a &#8220;back door&#8221; ban on abortion).<\/p>\n<p>Oh well.  On the bright side, it&#8217;s still OK to send grown-up babies to their deaths in Afghanistan, as <a href=\"http:\/\/www.cbsnews.com\/stories\/2009\/11\/09\/world\/main5592551.shtml?tag=contentBody;featuredPost-PE\">CBS is reporting that Obama has decided on sending about 40,000 additional troops there<\/a> &#8211; upping our presence to 100,000.  Or not.  That report was quickly denied.  Whether it was just a trial balloon, or the Obama administration doesn&#8217;t really know what the hell it&#8217;s doing, who knows?  Both of those seem plausible to me.  One thing I&#8217;ve come to believe in the past 10 months or so is that the Obama machine is a lot better at running for office than actually being in office.  <\/p>\n<p>Did you think that Carrie what&#8217;s her name with the fake boobs was finally over with?  You were wrong.  Her fifteen minutes has been extended once again, and she&#8217;ll be on the Today Show this morning to talk about masturbating on video.  I must admit, I&#8217;ve been a bit behind the curve on this one, haveing not even heard about it until I watched last Friday&#8217;s podcast of &#8220;Countdown&#8221; yesterday.  No word on whether or not the video is available on line somewhere (just a matter of time, I reckon), or who was behind the camera (or did she just set up a tripod and have at it), but, well, pardon me but is it illegal to masturbate?  Or even immoral or whatever?  As always, I admit I&#8217;m no bible expert, but I don&#8217;t recall reading about that being in there.  &#8220;Thou shalt not diddle thyself, nor be diddled by others.&#8221;  <\/p>\n<p>Of course, if you think about it in the extreme sense, masturbation is kinda like gay sex, in that you&#8217;re having &#8220;same sex.&#8221;  So nobody who has ever masturbated should be able to get married.  Or is it that you just shouldn&#8217;t marry yourself? <\/p>\n<p>I dunno, this bible shit is just piled too deep for me to understand.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I got an e-mail yesterday from somebody or other (Democrats.com or MoveOn or something; can&#8217;t find it right now), that said the House had voted for the &#8220;public option,&#8221; and now it was time to put pressure on the Senate. I wish you could actually reply to these e-mails, &#8216;cuz I&#8217;d like to ask them, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1920","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.morningseditionists.com\/msblog2\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1920","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.morningseditionists.com\/msblog2\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.morningseditionists.com\/msblog2\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.morningseditionists.com\/msblog2\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.morningseditionists.com\/msblog2\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1920"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.morningseditionists.com\/msblog2\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1920\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1921,"href":"https:\/\/www.morningseditionists.com\/msblog2\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1920\/revisions\/1921"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.morningseditionists.com\/msblog2\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1920"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.morningseditionists.com\/msblog2\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1920"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.morningseditionists.com\/msblog2\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1920"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}