{"id":7937,"date":"2013-05-22T11:29:16","date_gmt":"2013-05-22T15:29:16","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/morningseditionists.com\/msblog\/?p=7937"},"modified":"2013-05-22T11:29:16","modified_gmt":"2013-05-22T15:29:16","slug":"wednesday-97","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.morningseditionists.com\/msblog2\/2013\/05\/22\/wednesday-97\/","title":{"rendered":"Wednesday"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>My, my, my.  &#8220;The Press&#8221; has certainly gotten its collective panties in a bunch over the rather aggressive DOJ investigation into &#8220;leaks.&#8221;  This outrage was expressed today in a <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2013\/05\/22\/opinion\/another-chilling-leak-investigation.html?_r=1&#038;\">NY Times editorial entitled &#8220;Another Chilling Leak Investigation.&#8221;<\/a><\/p>\n<blockquote><p><em>&#8220;With the decision to label a Fox News television reporter a possible &#8216;co-conspirator&#8217; in a criminal investigation of a news leak, the Obama administration has moved beyond protecting government secrets to threatening fundamental freedoms of the press to gather news.&#8221;<br \/>\n[&#8230;]<br \/>\nObama administration officials often talk about the balance between protecting secrets and protecting the constitutional rights of a free press. Accusing a reporter of being a \u00e2\u20ac\u0153co-conspirator,\u00e2\u20ac\u009d on top of other zealous and secretive investigations, shows a heavy tilt toward secrecy and insufficient concern about a free press.<br \/>\n<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>In other words, it was fine when you and Dubya were spying on everybody else, but now that you&#8217;re doing it to us, we&#8217;re pissed!<\/p>\n<p>Of course, all your basic liberal media (and not so liberal media) are falling all over each other in condemning Obama.  So I guess this is what it takes to get them to wake the fuck up.  <\/p>\n<p>A few weeks ago I got new tires for my car.  Hated to spend the money, but they were pretty awful, so I figured I&#8217;d better bite the bullet and just do it.  I actually did the whole thing online.  Well, the purchase and payment part &#8211; I of course had to go to the place to have them mounted and all that.  Anyhow, part of the deal was a &#8220;buy 3 get 1 free&#8221; (by rebate) deal.  <\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;m notoriously horrible about doing the whole rebate thing with the mailing in the receipts and forms and shit, but there was an option to do it online. Online I can do, so that was no problem.  Unfortunately, instead of sending a check, they sent a prepaid debit card for the amount due (not that a check is much better, because I&#8217;m also notoriously bad at depositing checks in the bank &#8211; why can&#8217;t they just use Pay Pal?).  <\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;ve had these prepaid card things before, and I find them a pain to use because you never know how much is left on them, and then to use the remaining balance you have to like split the payment for whatever you&#8217;re buying and that involves talking to the cashier and then suffering the wrath of everybody behind you in line.  So it usually means the thing expires with a balance still left on it (which I assume is why they do it that way, &#8216;cuz they know the average person will get screwed out of at least part of the money).<\/p>\n<p>This time, though, I had an epiphany. I went to Amazon and bought myself an Amazon gift card for the full amount of the rebate card.  Poof, zero balance.  Then I applied the gift card to my Amazon account, and now I have a credit.  Seeing as I buy all kinds of shit from Amazon, I&#8217;m good to go.<\/p>\n<p>So I guess I&#8217;d better start shopping.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>My, my, my. &#8220;The Press&#8221; has certainly gotten its collective panties in a bunch over the rather aggressive DOJ investigation into &#8220;leaks.&#8221; This outrage was expressed today in a NY Times editorial entitled &#8220;Another Chilling Leak Investigation.&#8221; &#8220;With the decision to label a Fox News television reporter a possible &#8216;co-conspirator&#8217; in a criminal investigation of [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7937","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.morningseditionists.com\/msblog2\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7937","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.morningseditionists.com\/msblog2\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.morningseditionists.com\/msblog2\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.morningseditionists.com\/msblog2\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.morningseditionists.com\/msblog2\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7937"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.morningseditionists.com\/msblog2\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7937\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":7938,"href":"https:\/\/www.morningseditionists.com\/msblog2\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7937\/revisions\/7938"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.morningseditionists.com\/msblog2\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7937"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.morningseditionists.com\/msblog2\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7937"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.morningseditionists.com\/msblog2\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7937"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}